SaaS Media

44 B2B Buyer Journey Statistics

44 figures on how B2B buyers decide before they call a vendor, and the five or six brands an AI answer puts on their shortlist.

Author:
Vlad Shvets
Contributors
Vlad Shvets
Date:
October 9, 2026

Ask ChatGPT which software your team should buy and it hands you a shortlist. Across 413,276 answers that Qvery, our sister company, collected this year to the software questions it tracks, 99.08% of ChatGPT’s answers named brands, a median of six of them.1

Most B2B funnels still start counting at the form fill, which 6sense puts 61% of the way through the buyer’s journey, after the shortlist is drawn.2 The deciding happens before that form, which is where the RevOps work we run at Empact Partners starts.

The B2B Buyer Journey Moved Upstream Long Before AI

The old picture of a B2B purchase starts with a search, a demo request and a sales cycle. 6sense surveyed nearly 4,000 B2B buyers for its 2025 Buyer Experience Report, each with a purchase of at least $25,000 behind them, and compared the answers with its 2023 and 2024 waves:

97% of buyers already had personal experience with at least one vendor on their shortlist.2
First contact with a seller came 61% of the way through the journey in 2025, against 69% in the earlier waves, roughly six to seven weeks sooner.2
The eventual winner was on the buyer’s Day One shortlist 95% of the time, up from 85%.2
Buyers started the first conversation in 79% of deals, against 82% before.2

Contact moved earlier and the decision got harder to change, in the same year. A buyer who calls you sooner is not deciding sooner. They are checking sooner, and they still choose when the call happens.

Dumbbell chart of four measures from 6sense's buyer surveys, earlier waves against 2025: first contact came at 69% of the journey and then 61%, the winner was on the Day One shortlist 85% and then 95% of the time, the pre-contact favorite won 83% and then 77% of the time, and buyers started the first conversation 82% and then 79% of the time.
Nearly 4,000 B2B buyers with a purchase of $25,000 or more, 2025, against 6sense’s 2023 and 2024 waves.

Most buyers would skip the call entirely if they could. Gartner asked 646 B2B buyers in August and September 2025, and 67% said they prefer a buying experience with no sales rep in it at all.3

The pattern under these numbers is old. Buyers have done most of their deciding alone for years, in peer conversations, on review sites and from their own past purchases. What changed in the last two years is where they do it.

AI Search Is Now Where B2B Buyers Start

In March 2026 G2 put its questions to 1,076 B2B software buyers, and 51% of them said an AI chatbot, more often than Google, is where their software research begins. When G2 first asked in April 2025 it was 29%.4

Its June survey of another 1,038 decision-makers found 8 in 10 had sourced software recommendations from an AI chatbot in the previous two years.5

Each of these surveys publishes a share of buyers who “use AI”, and the figures disagree because the questions do. Quote the question with the number, or you are quoting how wide the question was drawn:

SurveyWhat it asked buyersShare
Forrester, Buyers’ Journey Survey 2025Use AI in their buying process94%, up from 89% a year earlier6
6sense, Buyer Experience Report 2025Used LLMs during their buying process94%2
TrustRadius, B2B Buying Disconnect 2026Used AI during their purchase journey63%7
Gartner, sales survey 2025Used AI during a recent purchase45%3

The broad questions land in the nineties and the narrow one at 45%. Read with their questions, all four say the AI step is now in most journeys, and how big it looks depends on how wide the survey drew it.

What an AI answer hands a software buyer

The surveys say buyers ask. What they get back is something we can count, through Qvery, our sister company, which measures how often AI engines name a brand.

We took the 413,276 answers Qvery collected on ChatGPT and Google AI Mode for the 28 software companies whose buying questions it tracks, from 5 January to 23 August 2026, and counted the brands in each:

99.08% of ChatGPT’s answers and 99.73% of Google AI Mode’s named at least one brand.1
The median answer named six brands on ChatGPT and five on Google AI Mode; on ChatGPT the middle half named four to eight.1
An answer naming a single brand was rare: 2.71% on ChatGPT, 1.30% on Google AI Mode.1

So the AI does not answer “which tool should we buy” with a tool. It answers with a list of five or six, and it gives that list to every buyer who asks.

Bar chart of the share of AI answers by number of brands named, for ChatGPT and Google AI Mode, 5 January to 23 August 2026: no brand 0.92% and 0.27%, one brand 2.71% and 1.3%, two or three 12.16% and 13.87%, four to six 47.93% and 55.88%, seven to nine 23.57% and 20.15%, ten to fourteen 10.43% and 7.61%, fifteen or more 2.28% and 0.92%.
413,276 answers to the buying questions Qvery tracks for 28 software companies, distinct brands counted per answer.

A separate Qvery study in September, built differently (five runs of unbranded questions in two categories on one day), landed in the same place: 98.00% of project management answers and 98.50% of CRM answers named a brand.8

Qvery is ours, so weigh the counts accordingly. That September study publishes every run’s brands in full, so you can check the shape without taking our word for it.

Buyers Trust the AI’s Shortlist and Check It Anyway

People do not only ask the AI. They act on what it says. In G2’s March 2026 survey, 69% of buyers ended up with a different software vendor from the one they had planned on, because of what an AI chatbot told them, and 33% bought from a vendor they had never heard of.4

Being named does work on the buyer: 85% think more of a vendor when an AI chatbot mentions it, and 83% feel more confident in their final choice.4 The same buyers report the failure rate. 64% meet inaccurate AI recommendations often or very often, and 45% say a citation from a software review site is what makes them believe an answer.4

Horizontal bar chart of what G2's March 2026 survey of B2B software buyers found AI chatbots do to their choice: 85% think more highly of a vendor an AI chatbot mentions, 83% feel more confident in their final choice, 69% chose a different vendor than planned, 64% meet inaccurate AI recommendations often or very often, and 33% bought from a vendor they had never heard of.
One survey, one population: every bar is a share of the same 1,076 buyers.

Of the 63% of buyers in TrustRadius’s January survey who used AI on a recent purchase, 94% fact-checked what it told them.7 And the trust has a ceiling buyers state plainly. In G2’s June survey, 47% would let an AI agent research and recommend while people keep the decision, and 9% would let it make the purchase.5

Vlad Shvets
Founder @ Empact Partners
Sixty-nine percent of software buyers say an AI answer moved them off the vendor they planned to buy, and none of them fill in a field telling you so. If your brand is missing from the answer you lose deals that never reach your CRM, and if it is there you win deals your attribution files under direct traffic. Both arrive in your pipeline review as a sales problem.

Highlights

94% of buyers ranked their shortlist before talking to a seller, and the favorite won 77% of the time.2
When nobody had ranked the list, the first vendor won only 57% of the time.2
Asked the same software question again and again, the AI named the same brand first in 48.02% of ChatGPT’s answers and 54.27% of Google AI Mode’s.1
A typical purchase decision involves 13 people inside the buying company and 9 outside it.9
83% of buyers shortlisted three or fewer products, while the median ChatGPT answer names six.7
The leading vendor’s own website was cited in 35.20% of one category’s AI answers, review directories in 4.80%.10
One partner went from 100,000 Reddit views and zero leads to nearly 40 qualified leads in a month, attributed by buyers naming the thread.11

Read together, they place the decision upstream of the form, inside a buying group the CRM sees one person of, built partly from an AI answer that reads vendors’ own pages. That makes it a measurement problem before a marketing one, and measurement is the plumbing RevOps owns.

The Shortlist Is Ranked Before Anyone Fills In Your Form

6sense asked its buyers when the ranking happens and who wins it. In the 2025 survey:

94% of buyers had ordered their shortlist by preference before engaging any seller.2
The vendor at the top of that list was the final winner 77% of the time, against 83% in the earlier waves.2
Among the 6% who had not ranked their list, the first vendor they spoke with won just 57% of the time.2
In a companion survey of 766 buyers, 58% engaged sellers sooner because they needed to know how AI was built into the product.2
Buyers logged 16 interactions per person with the winning vendor, one fewer than in 2024.2

The 57% is what makes it an argument. If the first meeting did the persuading, the first vendor would win more often when nobody had ranked the list, and it wins less often. The ranking persuades, and it is done before you arrive. The AI inside the product pulled the call forward. It did not pull the decision forward.

A demo request is a buyer confirming a decision made somewhere else, and a lead score built on it measures the confirmation.

An AI-built shortlist sticks harder than one built by hand. In G2’s June survey, buyers who sourced recommendations from an AI chatbot bought from their initial shortlist in at least three of their last five purchases 80% of the time, against 65% for buyers who did not.5

The AI keeps a favorite too, though a looser one. Each software question asked at least ten times in our Qvery run came up a median of 53 times.

The same brand came first in 48.02% of ChatGPT’s answers and 54.27% of Google AI Mode’s, and for the middle half of questions that share ran from 35.23% to 73.77% on ChatGPT and 38.32% to 75% on Google AI Mode.1

Spread chart of how often the brand a question usually names first leads the AI answer, middle half of tracked software questions: from 35.23% to 73.77% of answers on ChatGPT across 2,770 questions, and from 38.32% to 75% on Google AI Mode across 2,756 questions.
Each band runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile question; a median question was asked 53 times.

Qvery’s count is a different measurement from 6sense’s, so the two do not subtract. They point the same way: the buyer’s ranking is close to settled by the time anyone calls, and the AI’s list, for many questions, is still open. The place to get onto a shortlist is the answer, before the group sits down to rank.

Empact Partners, the go-to-market consultancy behind this page, runs RevOps from inside B2B software teams as one of its six workstreams: routing, the data on which signups deserve a call, and the path from first touch to closed. When a partner’s sales team says the leads are bad, we look first at what the lead score is scoring.

The Lead in Your CRM Is One of Twenty-Two People

Forrester’s Buyers’ Journey Survey of 2025 counts 13 people inside the buying organization and 9 from outside it in a typical purchase decision, twenty-two in all, and 73% of purchases cross three or more departments.9 Procurement alone sits among the decision-makers in 53% of buying cycles, from the start.12

Stat card of the B2B buying network in Forrester's Buyers' Journey Survey, 2025: 13 people inside the buying organization and 9 from outside it are involved in a typical purchase decision, and 73% of purchases involve three or more departments.
Averages per purchase decision across Forrester’s surveyed business buyers.

Now set two counts from different populations side by side, as a direction and never a subtraction. The median ChatGPT answer to a software question names six brands.1 TrustRadius found 83% of buyers shortlisted three or fewer products.7

Between the answer and the shortlist, a group of people you have never emailed cut the list down, and none of that meeting reached your CRM.

A CRM built around one contact per opportunity files a twenty-two-person decision under whoever filled in the form. In a RevOps engagement we enrich and tie every new contact to its account, so the procurement lead who downloads the security page and the engineer who asked ChatGPT last week show up as one buying group instead of two cold leads.

The AI Reads Your Own Pages Before It Names You

If the answer writes the first shortlist, the next question is what the answer reads. Qvery’s August study of paired buying questions in CRM found the leading vendor’s own domain in 35.20% of the category’s answers, and five tracked review directories together in 4.80%.10 The engine treats your pricing and comparison pages as the category’s documentation.

The other sources buyers trust have moved with it:

Review sites and AI chatbots now shape the shortlist about equally: 38% and 37% of buyers name each as the top influence.5
Analyst reports informed the decision for 13% of buyers, a 63% decrease since 2022.7
In project management, four brands made the top five of every run Qvery asked; in CRM, two did.8
In Qvery’s study of three young categories, the top three names took 45.97% of brand mentions for AI meeting notetakers and 25.59% for AI SDR tools.13
Broad shortlist questions make room for newcomers: a company founded in 2023 or later was named in 75.84% of head answers and 38.89% of narrow long-tail ones.13

A settled category is a list you plan against. A loose one is a list you can still join, which makes the category your buyers ask about the first thing worth measuring.

Your own pages doing the buyer’s research is not new to us. For PDF Reader Pro we wrote the product guides prospects read to try the tool before buying, and they came to carry 15–20% of monthly sales, with sales up 85% from June 2023.14

Getting into that answer is the Generative Engine Optimization half of this: GEO puts your brand in the answer an engine gives when a buyer asks about your category, and it is built from what your users say in public and what other sites write about you. RevOps tells you the answer is sending buyers. GEO works on the answer.

What the First Month of RevOps Instrumentation Looks Like

A CRM’s source field records the last thing that happened before the form: a newsletter click, a direct visit, an ad. It cannot record the ChatGPT answer that named you three weeks earlier, because nothing passes from the answer to your site except, sometimes, a referrer. The buyer can record it, if somebody asks.

So the first month of a RevOps engagement with us is mostly about where the buyer came from:

  1. Audit the source field: where it gets its value, and which routing rule overwrites it.
  2. Add one question to every form and to the first call’s notes, “Where did you first hear about us?”, in free text, stored in a field routing never touches.
  3. Split pipeline reporting by that answer, so an AI engine, a community thread or a colleague shows up as a source next to the paid channels.
  4. Read the engine side: whether the category’s AI answers name you at all, which Qvery measures every day.
  5. Start GEO beside it, because the answer your buyers quote back is the answer GEO works on.

The cheapest version of this has already worked for one partner. A specialty insurance brokerage came to us with 100,000 Reddit views across five posts and zero leads. After we rebuilt the program around the communities its buyers sit in, it produced nearly 40 qualified leads in one month.11

The attribution needed no tool. Buyers called the CEO and said which Reddit thread had sent them, which is the self-reported field done by phone.

In practice the engagement opens with that audit and a roadmap, a named senior consultant owns it and sits on the calls, and RevOps usually runs beside GEO or content because the three feed each other. The first month gives you a field you can trust. The pipeline it explains takes quarters.

Vlad Shvets
Founder @ Empact Partners
The “where did you hear about us” field costs nothing to add. Keeping it is the work: a rep who overwrites “a ChatGPT answer” with “inbound” on the first call has deleted the only record of where that deal came from. So most of the first month goes on making sure nobody can.

The Number to Watch Next Quarter

For every opportunity opened next quarter, put two columns side by side: what the CRM’s source field says, and what the buyer said when asked. The deals where the buyer named an AI engine, a community or a colleague and the CRM says direct or organic are the size of the journey your funnel cannot see.

Nobody can yet say how much of the AI’s list survives into the buyer’s. The surveys ask buyers and Qvery reads answers, and no study so far follows one buyer from the answer to the signature.

If your sales team says the leads are bad and you suspect the decision is being made somewhere your CRM cannot see, book a call with me, and let’s see whether we could work together.

Sources

  1. Qvery, our sister company: the 413,276 ChatGPT and Google AI Mode answers collected for the 28 software companies whose buying questions it tracks, 5 January to 23 August 2026, with the distinct brands each answer named and the brand it named first counted for this article, read 9 October 2026.
  2. 6sense, “2025 B2B Buyer Experience Report: How AI Is (and Isn’t) Disrupting Buying Journeys”, 2025.
  3. Gartner, “Gartner Sales Survey Finds 67% of B2B Buyers Prefer a Rep-Free Experience”, press release, 2026.
  4. G2, “New G2 Research: Half of B2B Software Buyers Now Start Their Research With AI Chatbots”, press release for The Answer Economy report, 2026.
  5. G2, “G2 2026 Buyer Behavior Report: The Evaluation Maze”, 2026.
  6. Forrester, “B2B Buyers Make Zero-Click Number One”, John Buten, 2026.
  7. TrustRadius, “TrustRadius 2026 B2B Buying Disconnect Report Reveals AI Has Changed How Buyers Research, But Not What They Trust”, press release, 2026.
  8. Qvery, “Have AI Engines Already Settled Your SaaS Category’s Top 5? Check Before You Try To Break In”, 2026.
  9. Forrester, “Three Realities About B2B Buying Networks”, Katie Fabiszak, citing Forrester’s Buyers’ Journey Survey, 2025, published 2026.
  10. Qvery, “Your SaaS Category’s AI Answers Run on Vendor Sites, Not Review Sites”, 2026.
  11. Empact Partners, specialty insurance brokerage case study, read 9 October 2026.
  12. Forrester, “Forrester’s 2026 Buyer Insights: GenAI Is Upending B2B Buying As Leaders Face Mounting Pressure To Justify Every Dollar Spent”, press release for The State Of Business Buying, 2026.
  13. Qvery, “First AI Recommendations for a Brand-New SaaS: What the Answers Had in Common”, 2026.
  14. Empact Partners, PDF Reader Pro case study, read 9 October 2026.

Ready
To Connect?

Let's Partner